DNA test and the natural herd instinct
DNA ethnicity test and the natural herd instinct
A few years ago I wrote articles emphasizing the need of maintaining racial purity as a way to protect the traditional Europe. For that reason I carried out a genetic test on myself, to check if I was racially pure. In addition, I did a thorough study of my name, and here the story is not as simple as I expected. I think it is fair to present my own genetic map instead of focusing on others. I presume that everyone can find something for themselves in this article.
As soon as I started publishing my articles about the need to preserve racial purity and protect the European culture, anti-Polish traitors forcibly dressed me in an SS uniform. I also experienced a lot of hatred from the extreme left-wing fanatics, to whom my work was like winning the lottery, because once again they could breath with hatred to everyone who thinks differently than they do. The so-called “tolerant, open and democratic” – really are like that, but only on a condition that everyone agrees with them. For that reason it came to my mind that through such behavior they themselves looked intolerant, because I think that people should also have the right to get to know that opinion which they disagree with, and which may offend them. In addition, I believe that people should be interested in topics such as: ethnicity, race and anthropology.
“Democracy consists of choosing your dictators, after they’ve told you what you think it is you want to hear.”
There are many companies on the market that can check a person’s geographical affiliation to the appropriate region of the world. I used https://www.ancestry.com/ but there is also https://www.myheritage.com/, and probably other companies in many countries. Unfortunately, none of these companies is able to accurately indicate which country exactly the person comes from, but it is able to provide the geographical origin of DNA on the world map, including the regional division. A DNA test for discovering one’s ethnicity definitely changes the way people think about themselves, and although most often there are no surprises, sometimes persons can discover incredible stories about themselves.
I always thought I was from Poland, and it is very possible that it is the case, but according to what the genetic map shows, I really come from north-eastern Europe, and therefore also from Poland. As far as I know I had an ancestor from Lithuania, what makes sense considering that Poland and Lithuania were once one country; and today this information is also determined by the geographical map of my DNA. The problem with these maps however is, that the genetic origin of a person includes entire regions, what means that it also includes parts of those regions which are not appropriate to my origin. Therefore, these maps always include a mistake in them, which Ancestry also confirms, and what I will talk about below. What I mean here is that I doubt that everyone who comes from Eastern Europe, has DNA originating from the North Island in the Arkhangelsk region, north of the Urals.
I therefore encourage to discover ethnicity, even though I don’t think it’s necessary.
The natural herd instinct
Wherever people moved, they always took their DNA with them. That’s why for some the results are more diverse, and for others, like me, they are more homogeneous. In order for my genetic map to be created Ancestry used over 40,000 reference samples and over 1,000 regions, including genetic pools of distant tribes in Africa, DNA of Mongol nomads, and residents of Irish villages. Thanks to this, anyone who conducts DNA testing can check how strong is his/her connection with each of those regions.
On the basis of genetic research conducted on me, and taking into account my previous articles, I realized that phrases such as “racial purity” or “pure blood” are the right of free choice of every human being, which is additionally the result of some genetic research in all races; not just white. In addition, when traveling around the world and observing the animal world, I saw that each of them adheres to its pack/herd, what means that “nationalism and xenophobia” (whichever way we would define them) are subconsciously the natural manifestations of each group. Wolves, deer, gorillas, Europeans, Africans, Chinese, orcs, elephants – because they are very different from each other they share an interesting psychological feature: “you look like us, so you are one of us”. Although animals and most people do not perform genetic testing, it is clear who belongs to the herd / nation / racial group, and who does not. When traveling around China or India, local people also indicated through their behavior that I was not one of them. No matter how someone is loaded with the leftist schizophrenia, he will never fool the natural perception of their own flock.
The Cultural Marxists have done a lot to obliterate our natural perception of the herd, but during my travels I also noticed that in racially different countries, Europeans make closer contact with one another regardless of the type of passport. Thanks to the natural understanding of the definition of a herd, native Germans, Poles, Swedes and white Americans become much closer in Burma or India. However, in a country like South Africa, where there is a huge criminal threat from Negroes, white people naturally form groups / herds to maintain their safety. In London there are neighborhoods for Blacks, neighborhoods for Muslims and for Indians; so people segregate themselves without even realizing it. The problem is only when the word “segregation” is used by White people, but especially by White heterosexual men.
Definition of a nation: A nation is a large population of people inhabiting one territory, which shares the same culture, history, language and ethnicity. This means that a nation lives in the same country under one government, and all people should be in theory equal in the eyes of the law. Therefore in my understanding, with the ongoing huge immigration of racial and cultural minorities in a given territory the nation is fragmented into several others, until that nation ceases to be a nation.
On the other hand, I don’t want to arouse extreme behaviors, because people are not animals. Diversity is needed, but at a distance. In a European country, Chinese or Iranian restaurants are needed, and I have nothing against Arab tourists. Europeans are welcome outside their own civilization too, which is why this chapter should be seen as an expression of tiredness with multiculturalism, rather than insulting people other than white. As a traveler, I have found out many times that there is something good and something bad in each of us, regardless of race, culture or religion. Let’s get to know other cultures, but let’s also protect our own.
As a side note, I would like to point out that in my description I talk about a different aspect of the “herd instinct” than the one described by the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche. I describe the “herd instinct” only as a theory based on a sense of security arising from racial solidarity against other races, while Nietzsche defined the “herd instinct” as the obedience of the individual to the mass, blindly and without reflection. In this case, just like Nietzsche, I criticize the herd instinct, as I do criticize democracy and equality, and all the socialist ideologies that feed on false morality and mental slavery.
Below I present three more geographical DNA maps for the author, with a more detailed regional breakdown.
Conspiracy theory or truth?
As for my racial background, there were no surprises, but let’s imagine a great surprise if a white person with blond hair and blue eyes would learn that in 2% his/ her genes come from Southeast Asia, or in 1% from the Sub-Saharan Africa. 1% – 2% DNA completely extracted from 98% of European DNA is obviously very little, and quite meaningless for example in the case of sheep shepherds in the Shetland islands or tailors in Russia. On the other hand however, the results of genetic testing make me wonder where the Polish Government really comes from?What stories could we learn if every Polish politician, bank owner, judge, prosecutor or journalist passed a forced DNA test? What in that case would show their genetic maps of the world, and would those results be accidental ??? I wonder.
But that’s not everything. I wonder what would show the genetic maps of the British Lords and people employed in the British politics? Would their origin be English, and what are their true names? Interesting?
In addition, I think that this type of research could be a nasty surprise for some, and perhaps it would be better if some people didn’t do it at all. The results of our research may not always coincide with our expectations, what could lead to a mental breakdown or at least to a huge reflection on oneself. Let’s imagine a member of the Ku Klux Klan who hates Negroes for their crimes and social problems, but his DNA result would show that he is 6% from the sub-Saharan Africa. Would he hate them less despite outright dislike of Africans? Let’s imagine a Jewish sniper who is a vicious Zionist and shoots Palestinians, but after genetic testing his DNA map would prove that he is 20% Arab. Would this DNA result change his opinion about the Arabs for the better, and would he treat them in a softer manner?
So I wonder if a Chinese pilot getting ready to drop bombs on Japan would hesitate if he turned out in his genetic test that he is 10% Japanese. History between China and Japan was a bloody one. It was a history of constant wars, a history of slavery and rape, which is why I doubt if 10% of his Japanese DNA would come from romantic love. I think that at least I should mentioned the massacre of the Chinese population in Nanjing, also known as the Rape of Nanking, which was committed by the Imperial Japanese Army in 1937/38. Even in such an extreme case, would a Chinese pilot who is 10% Japanese decide to bomb Japanese cities?
I prefer to leave this answer open, but those who would like to answer this question I think that first should rather think about something much more important. Well, which way would all the so-called “Germans, British, Dutch, Swedish or Belgians” of African and Muslim roots go, if a civil war erupted in Europe against the millions of immigrants from those regions of the world? In such case, after years of assimilation would all those people of coloured races fight on the side of Europeans because they would feel as the “new Europeans”, or they would rather fight on the side of people from their genetic pool?
As I wrote earlier, the results of genetic testing do not always coincide with expectations. For that reason I would like to give three general examples when it may turn out that we either have the wrong opinion about ourselves, or we might have been lied to our whole lives. I remember when during one of my visits to Poland I had a conversation with a young Vietnamese man who considered himself Polish and really wanted to be Polish. He said his parents were from Vietnam, but he was from Poland because he was born there and he spoke Polish. I explained to him very politely that he looked Vietnamese, and when he persisted, I advised him to look in the mirror and said that he didn’t even have a European face. Another time a young black man in England told me that he was 10% white. I was able to believe that, but I also told him that given the natural sense of the herd, all the white that I could see on him were his teeth.
Sometimes it happens that someone wants to be someone else, and forcibly invents his own reality, even the genetic one. Fortunately the genetic test against ethnicity never lies, and has that great advantage that it would be never accused of “racism.”
My Vietnamese who I met accidentally differed from the rest of the “European herd”, but there are also those who don’t differ, but do have traces of exotic DNA in them:
As I mentioned above, in my opinion genetic testing against ethnicity is not for everyone, and I think that sometimes it is better to not to know. African slaves were exported to North America to work in cotton plantations, which is why some white people today have a few percent of African DNA. The owners of cotton plantations used to look for exotic adventures with slave girls, when their wives were already asleep. In addition, U.S.A. is a colonial and immigrant country, what had huge impact on the overall DNA of the country.
According to the official information, the Red Army raped about 2 million German women since entering Berlin in 1945. This raises a question of how German are the nowadays Germans, especially that currently there are about 4.5 million Muslims and 200,000 Jews living in Germany? Of course the culture is very important, but in my opinion, in order for the German people to have a chance to continue their nation, it is important to have enough births within the same national and racial group. Bringing millions of Turks to Germany, giving them German passports and building mosques is not a way to save the Germans. I think exactly the same about England and every other European country, and that’s why racial purity is needed.
(My guess is that up to this point, to the Left I am a “neo-Nazi”, and that’s why it will be safer for me to mention that Israel is an ethno-state, where citizenship is also granted based on racial affiliation to the Jewish people.)
In the colonial times, the English brought native people of North America to England (the so-called Red Indians); as slaves, translators, and also to show English public the exotic people of the New World. In the 17th century Red Indians were imported to England in larger numbers, and therefore today their DNA is still present in England, although in a very small percentage. It is therefore clear that English men had exotic lovers from across the Atlantic Ocean, and even Pocahontas herself died in England around 1617. (As a side note, I have already written before about “the English adventures in multiculturalism”, and I regret to say that nowadays the English nation is like a bottle of milk – it has an expiry date.) From the bottom of my heart : Good luck England! ! !
Secrets hiding behind the name
In many e-mails and comments about me people raise the issue of my name, sometimes out of pure ignorance but more often to intentionally slander me, because of their reluctance and even hatred towards me. For that reason I would like to explain where my first and my last name came from and how to explain them. I have done research on this subject and I encourage others to discover the origin of their names too. I assure you that there are many secrets hiding behind surnames.
The name Martin comes from Mars, the Roman God of war, destruction and masculinity. Mars also protected soldiers and farmers. Over time the name Mars transformed into “Martin”, “Martyn” and “Marcin”, and it’s very popular in the European culture, also as a surname throughout Europe.
The surname “Malik” has two roots; one is West Slavic and the other one is Muslim and Indian (mainly from the state of Punjab).
In Arabic “Malik” means: king, owner (especially a landowner), a wealthy ruler or a town leader. In addition, Al-Malik (الملك) is one of 99 attributes of Allah, meaning “King” in the absolute sense. In turn, the equivalent of the Arabic word “Malik” in Hebrew is the word Melach (מלך). In the Koran, “Malik” is also an angel who didn’t smile since hell was created.
In addition, Arabs awarded titles to foreign monarchs (non-Arabs, representatives of foreign cultures and civilizations), and these titles given to foreign kings were also called “Malik” (from the Arabic: “ملك” – “king”). For example, the 12th century chronicler Baha al-Din Ibn Shaddad referred to King of England Richard the Lionheart as Malik al-Inkitar. It is therefore possible, that in the past centuries more European landlords in Arabia were honoured with the title given to foreigners – “Malik”, as nowadays in England one can get the title “sir”. This means that they became “Maliks”, that is rulers and land owners in Arab countries. Then, after returning to Europe the nobility titles given in West Asia became surnames which were permanently accepted in Europe.
As for the West Slavic origin, the surname “Malik” is quite popular mainly in Poland, Czechia and Slovakia, and among people with pale white skin and blue eyes. I mention this fact because several people in England said that I was the first white, blue-eyed Malik they saw in their lives. On the other hand, Muslims asked me if I was a Muslim because they didn’t have that information. Over time, the surname Malik in Slavic countries created its variations, such as: Malicki, Malikowski, Milik, Malek, Małek and probably also a few others. In England however, English people looking at me usually make mistakes and write my name: Malick, Mallick and even Mullick. On the other hand, if I was Indian they would probably write it correctly: Malik.
Interestingly, the Israeli intelligence was also under educated in this matter, because at the border crossing with Jordan they were so intrigued by the white Malik, that they kept me at the border for as long as 6h, to make their research about me. They too, did not have the information that I am giving right now, but because they regularly read my political articles about Jews, they would be certainly the first to learn that.
The second explanation of the origin of the name “Malik” doesn’t have any connection with the Muslim world. In Europe surnames come from the jobs done by the ancestors, but also from certain words in a given language. Following the Slavic languages I came to a conclusion that the word “malik” became a surname because it comes from the word “small, little”. In Czech and Slovak it is “maly”, in Croatian it’s “mali”, in Macedonian “mal” and in Russian and Ukrainian “malij”. It will be therefore a mystery to me, whether my ancestors managed Arabs or if some of them were just short.
It is a peculiar phenomenon that people from different parts of the world, representing different cultures, races and civilizations have the same or similar names, even though they never got married and they had never even seen each other.
I also found out that “Malik” is a popular name for boys in Greenland, and that it means “wave”. Interesting, isn’t it?
Our DNA always travels with us, and it only depends on us whether we leave it at the destination when we reach the shore. The only difference is that white DNA gets lost in coloured countries like stone in a water, while with the mass immigration of dark-skinned races to “white countries” the genetic trace they leave in Europe will be impossible to remove, unless through radical methods that I wouldn’t want. I hope that my article about geographical DNA maps and the natural herd instinct proved to be interesting.
I would like to emphasize that this is not a scientific article. The author is not a geneticist or biologist and is not able to carry out additional research, for example on haplogroups. The author wrote this article based only on the results of his own genetic tests, research on his own name, and private observations. The rest of it deals with a hypothetical question about possible racial and cultural solidarity in the drastically changing Europe.