Animals
-
-
The beach files -
Interesting people - unforgettable faces -
Burma (Myanmar) -
Armenia -
Tadżykistan
Political Prisoners of Great Britain; Part III-“Sam Melia”
Political Prisoners of Great Britain;
part III “Sam Melia”
Sam Melia is a political prisoner who was sentenced to 2 years in prison for distributing patriotic stickers. Melia was the organizer of the Patriotic Alternative organization, thanks to which he gave the opportunity to print stickers against the invasion of exotic settlers, and he also stuck some himself. Sam Melia’s case is particularly drastic, unjust and for many it has become a symbol of the oppression of the UK regime.
Samuel Melia
Sam Melia, a 34-year-old activist of the Patriotic Alternative organization is a political prisoner sentenced during the rule of the pseudo-Conservative party, when the prime minister was an Indian man Rishi Sunak.
Sunak was an unknown man who was plucked like a brown rabbit out of a hat by the Jews of the City of London, and cast as Chancellor of the Exchequer. After a while Sunak was elected Prime Minister by his own party members, so by by 0.00000001% of the UK population. Nice democracy?
Under the ‘Conservative’ party, which was officially against immigration, the invasion was twice as large every year. Samuel Melia disagreed with that policy and decided to speak out. Besides, Samuel was poor and was tricked into confessing.
In my article I intend to expose the bias and arrogance of the British injustice system. All you have to do is read the arguments of these pseudo-intellectuals and then compare them with my arguments.
The Crown Prosecution Service writes on its official website that:
- “Melia himself had slogans on his stickers expressing nationalist views.”
Yes, I have no doubts that it was so; but so what? He had the right to nationalism, especially since Muslims have the right to preach Jihad. Sam Melia had an even greater right to nationalism because he was an Englishman in England.
- ”Sam Melia had a desire to spread his racist views.”
What is racism because I’ve lost a clue? According to the global anti-white left, a ‘racist’ is a white person who dares to fight for the right of survival of white civilization. A racist is someone who does not agree with the replacement of society from white to black; and in England a ‘racist’ is even someone who flies the flag of England! The word ‘racism’ is as corrupt as the satanic communist Jew Leon Trotsky. Of course, in the understanding of British law ‘racism’ is a character trait that occurs only in people of the white race.
- “Sam Melia himself advised his fans to use a VPN.”
Is it illegal to use VPN? I also recommend using VPN to protect yourself from the flood of ads, although I might do it for other reasons as well.
- “After searching Melia’s home, police discovered a book by Oswald Moseley, founder of the British Union of Fascists, a poster of Adolf Hitler and a Nazi emblem.”
I believe that was the case, but so what? Everyone has the right to have a collection of historical memorabilia and literature of their own choosing. Sam Melia didn’t flaunt any of these things. He kept them in his home for private use. I also wonder if the Crown Prosecution Service would be as concerned if police apparatchiks found a portrait of Marx, Lenin and Stalin in Melia’s home, and if Sam Melia had a red hammer and sickle on the wall? I’m sure not!
Buying and owning Adolf Hitler’s “Mein Kampf” or Oswald Mosley’s “My Life” is legal, as is Karl Marx’s “The Communist Manifesto”. I suspect however that the latter would be very welcome by the Crown Prosecution Service?!
Sam Melia – sentenced to 2 years in prison for posting patriotic stickers.
⇒ Nick Price, head of the CPS Crime and Counter Terrorism Unit, said:
- “Melia knew perfectly well that the stickers he posted on his Telegram channel were being downloaded and pasted in public places across the country.”
Yes, he knew because that was his intention, but what’s the problem? In theory, or according to the law for the chosen ones everyone has the right to express their opinions, including political ones. Everyone also had the right to disagree. Melia himself never forced anyone to do anything. He didn’t knock on strangers’ doors, like the “Muslim Patrol” did, which the Crown Prosecution Service is not interested in because it fits their political agenda.
Where were Nick Price and his counter-terrorists when BLM, which is the terrorist organization raised on English soil was hanging posters on the streets? What’s more, I saw promotional posters of these hooligans and arsonists at the British Rail Kingston station, in the gallery on the platform. Nick Price! Poland and England want to know your opinion and your face!
I give a deep link to the scribblings of the British Crown Prosecution Service: UPDATED WITH SENTENCE: Far-right organiser found guilty of intent to stir up racial hatred through distribution of stickers | The Crown Prosecution Service (cps.gov.uk)
⇒ If anyone thinks that the Crown Prosecution Service is a copy of the KGB, let them wait until we meet the hate-sick judge Tom Bayliss.
Sędzia Bayliss found that:
- “Publishing this kind of material is harmful to our society.”
This particular sentence is a personal political opinion. In my opinion the verdict issued by Judge Tom Baylis is very harmful to our society because it destroys freedom of speech, entrepreneurship and innovation.
- “The stickers contained ‘ethnic slurs’ against minority communities, demonstrating ‘deep-seated antipathy towards these groups’.”
Samuel Melia didn’t have to prove to the whole world how much he liked everyone. In a democracy a citizen has the right to criticize and dislike a given racial and cultural group. I will note that the English have the right to dislike the French and Germans, but they have to love blacks no matter what.
- Like the Crown Prosecution Service, Judge Tom Bayliss was outraged that Samuel Melia had in his possession a poster of Hitler poster and Mosley’s book.
Sam Melia could have his own choice of literature at home, including the Koran which encourages the slaughter of infidels. Does Judge Bayliss have any objection to the Talmudic Jews declaring that non-Jews (goyim) are: ‘beasts in human form who exist only to serve the Jews?’ I doubt it! Perhaps he lacks in education on the subject, which is common in England.
Family of English patriots: Sam and Laura Melia. Sam was a victim of the communist apparatus of the UK and does not even have access to his children because he was classified by the regime as “dangerous to children due to his racist views”. In England you cannot raise children as you want. You have to raise them as the regime wants. (According to the regime in the UK the ‘drag queens’ degenerates are not dangerous to children.)
- “Referring to the books in Samuel Melia’s possession, Judge Tom Bayliss showed his bias and historical ignorance. He said that “this material has been used before to tear the heart of Western democracy” and that “it must not be allowed to happen again.”
I understand that Judge Tom Bayliss did not refer to the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917, that’s why I will get to the point through his way of thinking. Democracy has never existed anyway. I have described earlier how the Jews first destroyed Germany through the Treaty of Versailles and then through degeneracy of the Weimar Republic. As a result when the Germans had had enough they elected Adolf Hitler, who was also financed by wealthy and influential Jewish families from Wall Street and the City of London. If it was not for the Jews, Hitler would never have come to power.
If Judge Tom Bayliss is worried about the ‘tearing apart of Western democracy’, then he falls to us from the heavens. Democracy in the UK is being torn apart by, among others, Muslims, black gangs and the Zionist lobby, which funds key political and media organisations in the UK. I wonder if Sam Melia gave evidence during this case about how Muslims openly want to destroy democracy?
- Finally, Judge Tom Bayliss got to the heart of the matter: with his desperate: “You are an anti-Semite!”
No problem. Who is an ‘anti-Semite’ anyway? I’ll explain. ‘An anti-Semite is someone who does not fall for the Jewish trick, that is, the accusation of ‘anti-Semitism’, so that Jews can gain an advantage over others through this blackmail. An ‘anti-Semite’ is also someone who doesn’t treat Jewish interests as a priority. Let me remind you that Jews stole the word ‘anti-Semitism’ from Arabs, because Arabs are also Semites. This means that due to the brutal occupation of Palestine, the greatest anti-Semites are Jews.
! Finally, Judge Tom Bayliss mentioned what randomly came to his mind, so the standard charges of: ‘white supremacy, Nazism and racism’. Sam Melia was sentenced to 2 years in prison because (Attention!): “he was found guilty of intending to incite racial hatred by distributing stickers and inciting racially aggravated damage.”
As for racial and cultural hatred and vandalism, I suggest the UK regime to look at the actions of BLM and Antifa. The regime in the UK should treat seriously Muslim hate preachers who preach terrorism, stoning women and raping white women for racial and cultural reasons. As for criminal damages, does Judge Tom Bayliss find guilty the African hooligans and arsonists during the Brixton riots; and many others what is now the blacks’ tradition? I assume that when Muslims calling for the slaughter of Europeans and blacks burn streets and shops, this falls under the judge’s ‘justified anger’?
Part of Sam Melia’s sentence was for vandalism, that is not for smashing windows and setting cars on fire, not for destroying works of art ‘in the name of climate protection’, but only for hanging up stickers!! (I remind that in England I constantly see communists sticking stickers on poles, with invitations to their Marxist red cattle drives.)
⇒ In his closing argument prosecutor Tom Storey said:
“Sam Melia’s case is not intended to “limit freedom of speech”, and that “it is also not a case in which the prosecution wants to punish someone for their political views.”
Can even someone with the IQ of a baboon believe prosecutor Tom Storey? Tom Storey will certainly become famous in Poland. For the English this is still a novelty, but Poles have already seen many like him in the communist times.
This is Judge Tom Bayliss, who sentenced Sam Melia for distributing anti-immigrant leaflets and spreading patriotic views. Commentators have said that Bayliss has Semitic features. There is a suspicion that Tom Bayliss is a Jew hiding behind an English name, who deliberately destroys English patriots. Such examples were and still are common in Poland.
⇒ The man of truth and honour in this case was defence lawyer Richard Canning who said there was “not a shred of evidence that Hundred Handers or Patriotic Alternative encourages the breaking of the law”, and added that “the human right to free speech must be protected”. Unfortunately Sam Melia didn’t have right to free speech because in Soviet Britain whites defending whites have only the right to suffer in silence!
The Other Side of Judge Bayliss
On the other hand, Judge Tom Bayliss is very lenient if the case is not political. So if you are a paedophile or beat someone up for no apparent reason and threaten to murder, Judge Bayliss will be your best friend.
The drug addict, arsonist, sadist and alcoholic Devon Wainright found out about this when he abused his ex-woman and her new man. After brutally attacking the man, Wainright stomped on his head about 20 times and threatened to kill him, and in addition to physically and mentally abusing the woman, he threatened to burn her house down for a long time. In court, Wainright cried like a little child and thanked the judge for suspending his 2-year prison sentence for 2 years. As punishment judge Bayliss sent him to a course on domestic violence.
Judge Bayliss also pardoned an extreme pervert. Shaun Reeves had pornographic images and videos of children aged 3 and over, and one image showing a woman having sex with an animal. The evidence was overwhelming and the pervert pleaded guilty to all charges. Judge Tom Baylis gave him an eight-month prison sentence, suspended for two years, justifying his crimes as ‘possession’… demonic I presume.
“I don’t pretend for a moment that I know what possesses someone like you to derive sexual pleasure from watching children as young as three, six, or seven be raped, because that’s what you’re watching.”
“You probably don’t think about the children when you do this, but you should. The fact that you’re getting your own perverse sexual pleasure from it means that these children are being sexually abused in the most horrific way.”
Judge Tom Bayliss
In addition to suspending the prison sentence, Judge Bayliss imposed 30 days of rehabilitation activities and 200 hours of unpaid work on the offender. Article: Man caught with sex images of children as young as three – YorkshireLive (examinerlive.co.uk
(I wonder why such a sadist and pervert cannot try to terrorize me, but always women and children or those weaker than himself?)
I wonder what sentence Judge Tom Bayliss would give me for writing this article? I wonder how courts in Poland would handle cases like these?
Political prisoner Sam Melia
Political prisoner Sam Melia will have to serve at least half of that sentence, and the rest he might spend outside prison on certain conditions. He will be probably interrogated again in a politically correct dungeon, and released if he tells the regime that he converted to Islam or Judaism, and that he fell in love with blacks for their outstanding scientific achievements and cultural enrichment.
You can read about the views of Patriotic Alternative on their official website: Patriotic Alternative.
I recommend the above video in which real English people, including Sam Melia’s wife, describe the situation from their point of view. It is also important that by taking away Sam’s right to see his children, the UK regime violates point 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which states that:
“Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.”
Sam has never been a physical or sexual threat, so taking away his right to have a family because of his political views is a violation of this convention. It seems that in Britain access to human rights have only the Left.
TAGS
