The fall of the Anglican church
Short history of the Anglican church
Although Christianity had its origins in the British Isles since 47 A.D., when the Roman armies began to colonize England, officially the beginning of Christianity in the British Isles was over 500 years later. In 595 pope Gregory the Great ordered Augustine to lead the mission which was aimed at the Christianization of England. Two years later, in 597 Augustine became the first Archbishop of Canterbury and was recognized as an apostle of English people and the founder of the English church under the pope. Augustine built churches, gave mass baptisms and received more missionaries sent by the pope. Besides, Christianity became profitable because Christians began to receive land from the king and permission to spread the faith.
From the standpoint of not only the faith but also the culture, it meant that England found itself in the legitimate circle of the Western civilization.
In the opinion of most English people the beginning of the independent Anglican Church began in 1534 when Henry VIII broke off England’s sovereignty and proclaimed himself the leader of the Anglican Church. Independence from the Vatican was not dictated by ideological reasons because Henry VIII was a Catholic until his death and he never denied the theological teachings of the Roman Catholic Church, despite his excommunication. Henry VIII wanted the pope to let him divorce his first wife Katherine because he wanted to marry Anne Boleyn. The Pope however refused to give divorce to the Catholic king, what caused Henry VIII to take England out of the Vatican and start the English Reformation.
Although the Anglican Church was from that time fully commissioned by the Parliament, in 1555 England again returned to the full jurisdiction of the Pope. However, three years later, in 1558 Queen Elizabeth I explicitly rejected papal authority what caused a serious theological conflict between the Catholic part and the Reformed (Protestant) part of the Church of England. In the end it was decided that the Anglican Church would be both a Catholic church and a Reformed church.
At the time of the British Empire the Anglican Church also travelled to spread the Christian faith. Although the British Empire did a lot of harm to its conquered nations, it shouldn’t be forgotten that it also did many good things. The British Empire raised the standards of the conquered countries through trade, construction, infrastructure and medical care, and also built the economies and legal foundations of many colonial countries, which profit from the colonial rule until today. The Anglican Church also played a great role in colonial countries in the field of education, helping the sick and needy and in spreading Christianity.
For example in African countries, through its teachings the Anglican Church tried to teach primitive Negroes to not to eat each other and to stop stealing and murdering. The British Empire spread the Anglican Church in South and North America, in Australia, the Caribbean and many parts of Asia, also contributing to the level of education. Very importantly, at the same time in England, in the Victorian times, when misery was an inseparable part of the English life, the Anglican church ran free schools for the poorest children.
Considering that we live in the times of promoting the never ending White Guilt, the Anglican Church was forced to apologize for profiting on slavery. Officially slavery was abolished by the British Empire in 1772 but slavery in the British colonies continued until 1833. According to the official version which proclaims that Negroes are always innocent, always suffering and always in need, the Archbishop of Canterbury had to bow his head to blindly apologize and purposely omit important evidence which would be very politically incorrect.
The church was accused of making about £0.5m in slavery in today’s money and using Black slaves in the Caribbean. The Archbishop did not say however, that when the British came to Africa they fell into conflict with Negroes because they already had slavery, which had always been a part of the African culture. African leaders were furious at the British for changing their culture and that they didn’t want to do business with them over slavery, because strong Black men were treated in Africa like useful mules. Before the arrival of Europeans to Africa the eternally fighting each other African tribes used slavery, looting and mass rape one on another and they did it to such an extent that in the nineteenth century the Ashanti Kingdom even started a war against the British, because they forbid slavery.
Finally, in order to ensure good relations and by the applause of Africans the British allowed slavery and bought from African leaders the most worthless and the most stupid Negroes who could only steal and multiply like rats; and they still do until this day. On the other hand the Anglican Church took care of the slaves, it gave them shelter, medical care and education. The Anglican Church also gave Negroes the word of God so they would have certain values and they would stop eating each other. However, Negroes were ungrateful, they burned the schools, they burned books and churches and they were returning to their ape style of lives at all costs.
The problem today is that the Negroes wanted all the benefits of the White Men for free and they don’t understand that the church had to put down heavy money on them, and that’s why there is nothing to apologize for. Well, there is a saying that “you can take a nigger out of the jungle but you will never take a jungle out of the nigger”, and the Anglican church is a victim of that. We should ask how many Negroes would have died if not the Anglican Church. Meanwhile, after years of grace, care, education and attempting to civilize worthless Negroes, it turns out that all of that is the fault of the church.
According to the Global Slavery Index there are more slaves in the world today than when slavery was legal, and with that difference that today slaves are in all colours, including Whites. In China alone there are now more than 3 million slaves used by the Chinese corporations. Does this mean that the Anglican Church is also to apologize to China because Britain has turned Hong Kong from an obscure fishing village into a world financial centre? Anyhow, the absurd apologies have taken place already and as long as England does not stop apologizing for the sun and for the rain the Anglican Church will continue to be destroyed.
„Being a slave of fear is the worst type of slavery.”
George Bernard Shaw
The ways of destruction of the Anglican church
Currently the Anglican Church experiences a deep crisis, even though officially it has 85 million Christians in 44 different countries around the world. The large number of the faithful belonging to the Anglican Church only represent cold statistics based on the number of christenings. Unfortunately the true number of the faithful who regularly attend masses and take communion is sad, even dramatic. Before I go into statistic data I would like to say that the fall of the Anglican Church is not an accident but an evil conspiracy planned by the elites, which is based on the hidden war against Christianity.
The ideological basis of every anti – British government, and no matter what political party, is cultural Marxism based on destruction of the ethno-cultural roots of British people by promoting destructive ideologies, such as glorification of sodomy, feminism and liberalism. The official version of the enemies of the European culture is that: “people leave the church because technological progress contradicts the existence of God and those people who are religious are simply uneducated (read: Catholic)”. On the other hand the promotion of Islam and Judaism goes all the way and their cultures are promoted for the political purposes of traitors of the Afro – Britainistan, which they themselves created.
“What’s the more effective way of destroying Europe if not by destroying the basic Christian values, that Europe is based on?”
The anti – British governments fights Christianity in many ways:
- Mass immigration of hostile civilizations to the European culture. In this case globalists use Islam as a tool to destroy Europe, causing chaos, terror and weakening of Christianity.
- Arresting priests and keeping clergy in fear so they are afraid to say what they feel and they don’t proclaim the God’s word as it is different from progressive communism. Exactly the same methods existed in the Soviet Union under Stalin and in Poland during the communist times. Struggle with the church, putting priest into prisons and even killing them does not have an end.
- Ridiculous accusations and fabricated slander against priests in order to destroy the authority of the church with the help of the Jewish media. Apart from that promotion of hatred towards God and killing God in the hearts of men.
- Promotion of sodomy and sexual deviations of all kinds under the guise of false tolerance, in order to destroy the institution of the traditional Christian family on which the church relies. A well publicized case (warning: a remarkably disgusting material) of a lesbian woman priest who demanded equal rights in the name of human rights bill and had the support of English “Christians.”
“If a man lies with a man as he would with a woman, they have committed abomination. They shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
Levictus 20: 13
- Promotion of feminism to take women away from the role of wife and mother and to convince them that a man is the enemy and a competitor instead of a husband and a father. Feminism is contradictory to the teachings of the true church and the biological role of women in society. Men and women have different roles in their lives and that’s why by deliberately shaking this balance the church loses authority and society loses normality. Fraudulent female feminism fights for their rights but they forget that the most beautiful and the most valuable woman’s right is to get married and give birth to children.
- Promotion of liberalism which aims to advertise in public life everything that is immoral, harmful and anti-Christian.
“You must not have sexual intercourse with a male as one has sexual intercourse with a woman; it is a detestable act.”
Levictus 18: 22
- Forcing the church to ordain homosexuals which is a direct violation of Christian values. The task of the priest is to teach about family values and the role of God in family life, but if a priest is a degenerate communist, then such teachings are no longer credible. The Anglican Church should once again read the passage from the Bible about the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah because ordaining perverted priests is synonymous with the end. That way, the Anglican Church became a church of heresy and degeneracy.
In 1992 the Anglican Church became a victim of ill feminism and decided that women could become priests and even bishops. This decision is not only contrary to the teachings of the church but it is an absurd and makes the Anglican Church a victim of cruel and shameful ideologies such as liberalism and feminism. Jesus had 12 apostles and they were all men and that’s why priests should be only men while a woman standing at his side should be a nun. This means that the church is open to all while maintaining its balance.
“But I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.”
(1 Corinthians 11:3).
- Intentional de-Christianization of the British society by removing Christian terms from daily life, for example through de-Christianization of Christian holidays. Word “bishop” disappeared from the English bilingual dictionary and instead of “Merry Christmas” in England is used an anti-Christian slogan “seasonal greetings”.
- The politics of double standards that involves legal discrimination against Christians. A Muslim who ripped the Bible was given a fine of £50 and he was honestly surprised because he himself admitted that it was less than a parking fine. However, when in retaliation an Englishman burned the Koran he was sentenced to a fine and 6 months imprisonment. Whenever small groups of Christians come out on the street, communists send Muslims or homosexuals to them in order to destroy Christianity.
- Blurring the barriers between genders and intrusive promotion of transvestites in the media to destroy the role of mother, father and their children as a symbol of the Holy Family. Part of these practices is called genderism, which aims to destroy the psyche of young children by teaching them sexual abominations and teaching satanic tolerance to all the things that are anti-Christian and immoral.
- Promotion of consumptionism so that British people could respect only money and see money as the only moral value in life.
- The British government creates social problems and promotes a degenerate lifestyle as the tool of fighting the church. If the government wants to solve the problem it can certainly solve it, but the anti-British government needs children alcoholics, children prostitutes and Black and Muslim gangs, because for the public these will be always the problems of the first contact which will not force people to think about their real enemy.
- Promotion of intrusive, worthless and stupid pseudo-music and pseudo-art so that the British nation could identify itself with false prophets and be at a low cultural level where there is no place for God.
- Involving religious leaders in destruction of the church. The Bishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams made himself an enemy of Christianity and a naive idiot when he stated that “he can’t see any problem for Muslim women to wear hijabs whilst teaching in schools in England.” My answer is: “There is no problem for the Israeli army to educate Palestinian children and there is no problem for the wolf to keep an eye on the sheep.” Anti-Christian archbishop Rowan Williams was also against the ban on wearing hijabs by Muslim women in France and during an interview for Emel magazine he stated that “Muslims in Europe play the role of good Samaritans.” Unfortunately that is not all. Pseudo-Christian archbishop Williams also defended the Islamic Sharia law because “he had nothing against its elements being introduced in England.” My answer to his nonsense is: ” In the name of tolerance and liberalism he could also introduce elements of the Lucifer’s black Bible in England to not to offend satanists. ” After the bombing in London which killed 52 people and wounded 700 that clown in a priest uniform stated that: “Muslims committing a terrorist attack have nothing to do with Islam.” My answer to his nonsense is: “that a car that drove over a pedestrian has nothing to do with the driver.”
In his infinite naivety Rowan Williams apologized to the Freemasons for his inconsiderate statements on them that “Freemasonry and Christianity do not fit in”, but then to make it more pleasing he said that “some Freemasons had good intentions” and admitted that his father was a Freemason. Well, everything is clear.
In addition, according to some Anglican bishops Prince Charles should read from the Koran at his coronation in order to welcome Muslims and make them accept the new king. The Anglican Church is the enemy of its own culture and its own history and it has run an extra mile to promote Islam.
“Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned.”
- Involvement of the anti-Christian Royal Family in the propaganda of heresy against Christianity. During Christmas wishes the Queen said that “Jesus was a man who taught people tolerance and that there is something good in each of us”, even though it is exactly the opposite to what the Bible teaches. First of all, according to the queen Jesus was only a human and nobody else. Secondly, Jesus did not teach tolerance or that we were good but that we were such great sinners that he had to die in torment for our sins. In my opinion, the Queen read a paper written for her by Freemasons and she has no idea about Christianity.
- Prince Charles is in love with Islam to such a degree that he said that if he becomes a king and therefore the head of the Anglican Church, he would “not be the defender of one religion (I understand the Anglican Church) but the protector of many religions.” Prince Charles also added that “he hopes the West will not be prejudiced against Islam and that Islam will find its place in British laws and traditions.” To me Prince Charles could become the King of Pakistan but if he becomes the King of England, then in corporation with Jews from the British Parliament he would finish off England and English people. In 1997, the Middle East Quarterly magazine wrote an article titled: “Prince Charles of Arabia”, in which was stated that Prince Charles could become a secret convert to Islam. Perhaps this is just a journalistic exaggeration but the fact is that Charles studies the Koran with great passion, he defends Muslim rights, he praises the status of Muslim women and sees Islam as the future for Britain. For those reasons I have no doubt that Prince Charles is just another high profile traitor of the British nation and Christianity.
- Falsifying history to the disadvantage of the church. Many times we have seen priests bowing their heads and apologizing for the crusades. The fact is that crusades took place but no one wants to add that they were used as a defense against jihad. When Muslims conquered the Iberian peninsula, Greece and reached Eastern Europe many Christian cities were destroyed, women were raped and sold as slaves and men were beheaded. As a result the Pope sent crusaders to defend Europe against Muslims so they could push them back to the Bosphorus and back to Africa. Therefore crusades were used as defense against jihad, although church these days is not willing to admit it. For that reason I support the crusades with all my heart.
- Christian schools in England accept children from other faiths to weaken Christianity, even though the official story says that it is done so that the church is open to everybody. But on the other hand Muslim schools are only for Muslims and Jewish schools are for Jews only. There was even a case in England when a Jewish school refused to accept a boy whose mother was Christian and father was Jewish because according to the Jewish law Jewishness is passed by the mother. Interestingly, I also had a conversation with a Muslim Turk who sends his children to a Catholic school because, as he said, “there is a better level of education there and his children can pray to Allah in a Muslim way.”
- The relationship of the Anglican Church with Zionism is evident and based on automatic support for Israel’s crimes against the Palestinians. Every archbishop of Canterbury is insanely supportive of Israel and flattens to the ground everyone who dares to criticize Jews, while at the same time it ignores the crimes committed by Muslims and Negroes in England on English people. One of the Anglican priests Stephen Sizer ventured to criticize Israel and that’s why he was severely punished by the church management, even though he was not the first and not the last one. The Archbishops Williams and Welby have repeatedly stressed that “there is no place for antisemitism in the civilized world” but on the other hand in the same “civilized world” they have no problem with the White-genocide policy, with the tragic fate of Palestinians and with other wars and regimes supported by the British government. The Anglican Church is so hypocritical that it has been even called a “Zionist whore.” In England there is even the Hebrew-Christian “Alliance” of Britain, where Jews openly admit that its official purpose is “to promote the combination of Jewish cultural heritage within the Christian theology” – so that the Zionist Jews could infiltrate the church. The Jerusalem Post even published an article in which Jewish journalists stated that the first rabbi of the United Kingdom Jonathan Sacks had the first voice in the Anglican Church, even before the Archbishop. Archbishop Welby went so far that he called the criticism of the Jews “blasphemous.” This means that the Anglican Church is made up not of the followers of God but of the followers of the Jews and this is the way we should look at this false church.
- The Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby was asked whether he believed or doubted in the existence of God. He replied: “That’s a good question. I have to think about what to say. Yes, there are times when I doubt God. Where is God? Later however, he added that he had doubts about the existence of God after the attacks in Paris, although he admitted that he should have put it differently. A little later he added that: “he wholeheartedly supports the ordination of women to bishops”. Who are the bishops of the Anglican Church? They are sinful pharisees who proclaim the word of God and build golden palaces but in their hearts they have lies, emptiness and treachery.
- Organizing a multi-religious circus as a necessary procedure in the creation of a global religion. This kind of circus takes place with Jews and Muslims.
“You shall have no other gods before me.”
- To remind English people that their country doesn’t belong to them anymore, the 97th bishop of York became a Black man from Uganda Mugabe Sentamu. By the way, the “bishop” Sentamu is the sixth of thirteen siblings of Negroes. I have no doubt that he became a bishop just because he was Black.
- Lastly, putting Christians of different denominations into a constant conflict while promoting Islam. The British Government does what it can to build hatred between Protestants and Catholics in Northern Ireland and in the British press I even saw an article that St. Paul’s cathedral was a big controversy when it was built in a Protestant country. The English are proud of the fact that England left the Vatican and as they say “they got rid of the Romans”. On the other hand there are about 1700 mosques in Britain and one was even built in the historic district, in Baker Street near Regent’s Park, with a high minaret and a huge golden dome. With this however English people have no problem but with Catholics they do. Moreover, English people do not like Polish shops but on the omnipresent halal shops they don’t dare to comment because of “racism”. As a curiosity I will say that the Central Mosque and the land next to it, better known as the mosque in Regent’s Park were solemnly offered to Muslims by the Royal Family in 1944. When Prince Charles becomes king, I suspect it will be his favourite place.
Additional observations on Protestantism
Because of all the above I do not recognize the Anglican Church as a Christian church but as a church of political correctness, the church of liberalism, homosexuality and feminism and the church of theological chaos and all the anti-values that destroy the European culture. The Anglican Church occupies itself with promotion of Islam and killing God in the hearts of British people. In the Anglican Church the gospel is not even important anymore, but instead how many homosexuals and women have been ordained priests because now they have new gospel promoted by the Marxists in the name of false equality and false human rights. Unfortunately this is not all because the Anglican Church is also a Masonic church headed by the Masonic Royal Family which has no idea about Christianity. The Queen is a Christian only by her name alone and her son and the future king Prince Charles loves all religions except Christianity. The Anglican Church works hard to cut its own veins. The temples are empty, some are covered with bushes and cobwebs and others are converted into flats and mosques; and apart from small exceptions English people don’t even care about it.
In England, Easter and Christmas are no longer Christian holidays but seasonal breaks from work dedicated to shopping, eating and drinking above limits. During Christian holidays which English people simply do not understand and which they laugh at, churches are empty but pubs and restaurants are always full. Once I went to an Anglican church for Christmas and out of 100 chairs and many standing places there were only 10 people. Even the so-called right wing, which from time to time tries to defend the church is itself ungodly but for political reasons patriots and nationalists have a problem that their churches are converted into mosques. They forget however that Muslims would never take any church if English people were strong Christians. Therefore Muslims do not adapt churches into mosques. They take over post-church buildings that English people are not longer interested in.
„Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thorn bushes, or figs from thistles? Likewise, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them.
Matthew 7:15 – 20
The fruits of the Protestant heresy are: disagreement, destruction of Christian unity, departing from the faith, promotion of secular culture, degeneracy, denying and twisting the truth and killing God in people. The Catholic Church should cleanse its ranks from the Protestant heresy and then unite all Christians under one Catholic Church, especially that there are enormous amounts of hatred in Protestants against everything what is Catholic. There are currently around 40,000 different types of Protestant churches in the world and each of them creates heresies based on lies and degeneracy, but really only for economic purposes. I also do not argue that every Protestant is a heretic but the system itself is.
Perhaps not many people have noticed but in Protestant churches attention is focused on people sitting on the benches, on paintings that hang on the wall, on choir, on the table covered with a cloth, and again on people holding hands and on special guests – as if it was a show in a theater or fireworks evening where the purpose of adoration is only the place itself. However, the attention is very rarely focused on the altar itself or the gospel because Protestantism in its nature is a heresy under many names such as Henry VIII, Martin Luther or John Calvin.
What can we expect in the near future from the anti-Christian Anglican Church? If a flock of English sheep does not wake up and if Charles becomes king, then the Anglican church will fight for the idea of a global religion, which will make it a church of all religions and none at all at the same time. Then the Canterbury-based global church will have an excuse to promote Islam and to surrender completely to Judaism. In the global-Anglican church there will be masses for few Christians but mostly for Muslims, which will be presented by the Marxist media as the false “evidence of Muslim assimilation to the British culture”, and as a result, by the applause of eminently anti-religious liberals and feminists will finish off the British culture completely.
The English however, afraid to offend anybody in the fight for their country will sell Britain in silence and without fighting to avoid losing their jobs and benefits. Anger of British people on their government will be fulfilled by building hatred for Catholic Eastern European immigrants, because this is all that they are allowed to do. It is also worth mentioning that the global church will be the Satan’s playground because Satan is a globalist. In the age of destruction of Christianity in the pseudo-Anglican Church we can expect homosexual marriages so the Protestant church becomes openly the church of sodomy.
„Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’ And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness!“
Matthew 7:21 – 23
The above quotation from the Bible fits perfectly to Protestants but especially to the Anglican Church which was not built by Jesus but by the blood thirsty king who murdered his wife to satisfy his sexual desires. These are the foundations of the Anglican Church and its end will come, while the Catholic supremacy will continue.
„Therefore everyone who hears these words of mine and puts them into practice is like a wise man who built his house on the rock. The rain came down, the streams rose, and the winds blew and beat against that house; yet it did not fall, because it had its foundation on the rock. But everyone who hears these words of mine and does not put them into practice is like a foolish man who built his house on sand. The rain came down, the streams rose, and the winds blew and beat against that house, and it fell with a great crash.””
Matthew 7:24 – 27
The Anglican Church was built on sand, the Catholic church on the rock. The longer I live in England the less I am surprised with the above quote because England is an artificial country where people never stop pretending. In England there is artificial food, false politicians, selfish and artificial Royal Family, people are masters of falsehood with a thousand masks on their faces and that’s why their church is also artificial. The Anglican Church is so arrogant that it denies the divine mission of Mary which as a result was also the mother of the church, without which the Anglican Church would never exist. Jesus could come in many ways but he was sent to earth through Mary because she was special in the eyes of God. However, for Anglican priests it does not matter because Henry VIII killed the mother of English children and wanted them to be forgotten. In my opinion, the rejection of Mary by the Anglican Church is a vulgarly sophisticated rebellion against the Catholic supremacy.
“A lie is like an ugly blot on a person. Ignorant people continually lie. A thief is better than a habitual liar, although both are headed to ruin. The way of a liar will lead to disgrace, because his shame is always with him.”
Syr 20: 24 – 20: 26
The Anglican Church – a church only by its name
The Anglican Church as a contractual religious institution exists in about 165 countries and has about 85 million members. But the situation is so dramatic that even the Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby admitted at the Lambeth conference, which is held every ten years, that it may no longer be held. The official figures of 85 million members I personally compare to the old philatelists’ club, which boast of having 100 000 members, even though it is regularly visited only by 10. That’s because no one from that club has officially signed out and exactly the same case is with the Anglican Church, and by the way the same is with the British Commonwealth. Officially there are a lot of members, officially they are all under the Archbishop (or the Queen), but in reality everyone does what they want, everyone is independent from one another and the only thing they have in common is a complete lack of interest in the church. Various fractions of the Anglican Church disagree with one another what causes its further split, even without taking into account symbolic attendance in the masses.
The bone of contention are the rights of homosexuals, their ordination to priests, homosexual marriages and ordination of women to priests. African churches are more conservative (normal) and Anglican churches in America or Canada exist only to promote sodomy and feminism, while explicitly denying the Bible. The Anglican Church in the United States elevated to power the first homosexual bishop Jean Robinson, what means that it is impossible to take such church seriously. Further division of the Anglican Church on all continents is happening in front of our eyes and the forcibly promoted unity is pure fiction. Several churches in Asia and Africa broke away from the episcopate and in the United States and Canada has emerged a hedonistic creation called the Anglican Church of North America (ACNA).
Just for that reason many Anglican priests switch to the Roman Catholic Church because they are unable to bear the anti-Christian nonsense which is pushed by the Anglican Church straight into a coffin. It is now clear that different branches of the Anglican Church in New Zealand, Australia, Canada, the United States and African countries will set up their own sects for profit. But when it comes to England alone, in my opinion in 20 years nobody will see a point in screwing a light bulb in a church. Britain’s culture has become almost anti-Christian because of the immense immigration of foreign religions, because of promotion of sodomy, feminism and distracting people from the church in all possible ways; for example by creating dirty accusations against priests.
I once met an Englishman who hated the Anglican Church because it had more money than he did. In my opinion the Anglican Church has found itself in a situation without retreat and the only thing that could save it is a miracle. However, considering the godless mentality of English people I think that even if Jesus Christ appeared in heaven, the English would not go to church anyway, unless Jesus would throw them money. Therefore the Anglican Church is not put to death by Muslims but by English people themselves.
“One who lives practicing the vice of sodomy will suffer more pain in Hell than anyone else, because this is the worst sin that exists.”
Saint Bernardine of Siena
At the 2001 census 72% of people in the UK were considered Christians but in 2011 only 59%. In addition, one in four people wrote that they had no religion, which is an increase of atheism by 15%. When it comes to attending masses only 2% of the British population regularly goes to the Anglican Church. According to a study conducted in October 2014 there were 980 000 people on Sunday masses, and a year later it was only 760 000. The situation becomes worse also because of death of the older generation which was really English, but the politically correct Anglican Church would not dare to add that it will lose about 1% of the faithful a year also due to the ethnic and cultural replacement project in Britain.
Usually English people go to the church during important Christian holidays such as during Christmas, which in England has been converted by the Marxists into the “winter season”. In 2014 2.4 million English people went to the churches, what means that it was a small fraction of more than 60m population. The downward trend compared to 2004 is exactly the same for baptisms (- 12%), weddings (-19%) and funerals (-29%). That means that out of 26m registered Anglicans in England, in reality there is a lot less of them than 1m.
In other parts of the world it is just as bad and after every census it is clear that the Anglican church falls on its face. In Nigeria there are officially 18 million Anglicans, but really there are a lot less than 2 million because only that many go to church from time to time. In New Zealand, for the first time in modern history Christians are no longer the majority because they represent only 47% of the population. However, the worst situation is with Anglicans because over 6 years the Anglican Church lost almost 100 000 members. In 2006 in New Zealand there were 550 000 Anglicans and in 2013 there were only 450 000 and there will be less and less. In order to save its honour the Anglican Church reported that many older Anglicans have died but this does not reflect the whole truth. A lot of people could not bear sodomy and feminism and that’s why they switched to the Catholic Church, while others have lost interest in the Christian faith completely. This has made New Zealand’s Catholics the strongest group of Christians.
In Australia from generation to generation and from one census to another it is evident that it is a country of atheism. Since 1991 the number of people taking part in the Masses has decreased by 40%. Officially, the Anglican Church in Australia has 3 670 000 members but on average Sunday Anglican churches in Sydney are attended by 68 000 and in Melbourne only by 21,000, while in the whole of Australia the church sees only 177 000 Anglicans. Every few years it turns out that Australians massively leave the Anglican Church and declare their atheism or lack of interest in faith. According to a research conducted by the Christian Research Association, as many as 40% of people raised as Anglicans have declared that they have no religion.
It is not only the English culture and the ethnic roots of the English nation that become a part of history but also the artificial Anglican Church, which promotes heresy, sodomy and feminism. In my opinion, the English will not even figure out that there is such problem because they still live in a historical illusion that they are great and that they have an empire and because of their arrogance of greatness and deep hypocrisy they are unable to admit that they are being colonized and impregnated by Black and Muslim primitives. Nations such as Poland and Ireland are the first to admit that they are under occupation because they were occupied themselves, but English people glitter with pride despite the fact they are being pushed out of their own cities and their women and children are being raped by the elements of the lowest ethnic and cultural level.
After the Second World War England could have kept its empire and could have saved lives of many English soldiers, but that would have meant giving Hitler a hand against the interests of the Zionists in the occupied Palestine. That is why the Zionist agent Churchill bled his own people and allowed the British Empire to end. Today however, the British are even losing their own island because it is again in the interest of globalists of the Jewish origin. Unfortunately Poles, who English people don’t even like and don’t even say a good word to, would not defend England every 80 years. On the other hand the Anglican Church, which is just another branch of the Zionists in England hits the rock bottom proportionally to the level of degeneracy of the English. It is very possible that one day the Anglican-backed Muslims would head to the Canterbury Cathedral and expel the representatives of Sodom and Gomorrah to the last one of them.
“For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into apostles of Christ. And no wonder! For Satan himself transforms himself into an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also transform themselves into ministers of righteousness, whose end will be according to their works.”
Second letter to Corinthians 11:13-15
- Anglican church
- Christian Zionism
- Degeneration of the Anglican church
- Fall of the Anglican church
- false church Anglican
- feminism in the church
- fight against Christianity in England
- history of the Anglican church
- homosexuality in the church
- Islam in the Anglican church
- women priest in the Anglican church
- Zionism in the Anglican church