The philosophy of truth and deceit; part V – Al takiya-The Islamic philosophy of deception
The philosophy of truth and deceit; Part V – Al takiya – The Islamic philosophy of deception
Generally the philosophy of al-takiya means: ‘Let us learn to smile to those who we hate in our hearts’. This means that Muslims can eat pork and they can drink alcohol. Muslim can even deny their prophet and can even deny Allah. Muslims can even openly criticize Islam and they can draw caricatures of Mohamed, and for all those things they would go to paradise, but they can do all the above things if they do it to make Islam stronger, or to gurantee the final victory of Islam, through weakening the ‘infidels’.
Introduction to the philosophy of al-takiya
People who are not interested in Islam and the dark nature of Muslims, it is easier to convince that theoretically ‘lies in Islam are forbidden’, and that apparently Muslims should always say the truth. In my chapter about the Koranic philosophy of deception I will show that Islam has not only nothing to do with the ‘religion of peace’, but that it is also built on lies, and that lying and deceit are inseparable components of Islam.
I will also prove that those who have converted to Islam are the symbols of naivety, and that even Jesus himself made us understand that Mohamed, who will be the false prophet will come after him:
And the LORD said to me: “The prophets are prophesying lies in my name. I did not send them, nor did I command them or speak to them. They are prophesying to you a lying vision, worthless divination, and the deceit of their own minds.”
In the Koran there are two kinds of deception: the first called “takiya” and its Shia version “kitman”. Each type of the Koranic deceptions is based on lying in order to defeat the ‘infidels’ and to weaken them, or at least to gain their trust in order to strengthen Islam over other religions. The final aim of al-takiya is the final victory of Islam, and it doesn’t matter whether someone would have to pay with death for the Koranic lies. It is only important that a Muslim should always treat the ‘enemies of Islam’ as subhumans who should be lied to until the final victory of their religion.
What is Al-takiya
Generally the philosophy of al-takiya means: “Let us learn to smile to those who we hate in our hearts.”
This means that Muslims can eat pork and they can drink alcohol. Muslim can even deny their prophet and can even deny Allah. Muslims can even openly criticize Islam and they can draw caricatures of Mohamed; and for all those things they would go to paradise – but under one condition only. Muslims can do all the above things if they do it to make Islam stronger or to gurantee the final victory of Islam; which is revenge on ‘infidels’ and exploting their weaknesses, and eventually to profit from actions which are seemingly incompatible with Islam.
Even Koran itself has a few verses stating that ‘there is no greater deceiver than Allah’, although in the Koran he is often called Makr:
“But they (the Jews) were deceptive, and we were also deceptive, for Allah is the best of deceivers (Wamakaroo wamakara Allahu waAllahu khayru al-makireena)!” S. 3:54; cf. 8:30
“Are they then secure from Allah’s deception (makra Allahi)? None is secure from Allah’s deception (makra Allahi) save folk that perish. S. 7:99
(In my point of view this quote should be a warning to Muslims because it means that ‘a good Muslim’ after death might be cheated by the ‘greatest of deceivers’ and might go to hell anyway).
“So they planned deception and we planned deception, but they perceived not” S. 27:50
“The believers must not establish friendship with the unbelievers in preference to the faithful. Whoever does so has nothing to hope for from Allah, unless he does it out of fear or taqiyah (pious dissimulation).” (Quran 3: 28)
A good example of al-takiya is when Muslims arrive on a mass scale to non-Muslim countries, and as long as there aren’t too many of them they pretend to be friends of the native people, and sometimes they even criticize Islam. However, when there are more of them they show that their true purpose was to gain trust of naive Europeans, so they could hit them with full force when there more of them. A common example is an encounter of a Muslim man with a Christian woman. A Muslim would do absolutely anything to make her believe that he wants to completely get away from Islam, and convince her and her family that he wants to fully assimilate to the European culture. However, after marriage a Christian woman must wear a headscarf, she is harassed to convert to Islam and her only mission in life is to give birth to as many Muslim children as possible – and raise them to become the new fighters for Islam. Then, according to the teachings and assurances of the Koran that there is no greater deceiver than Allah, such Muslim is considered to be a hero because he weakened the ‘infidels’ by taking one of their women and having Muslim children with her. In such circumstances his earlier renunciation of Islam is his al-takiya, what means a religious deception, for which according to Koran he will enjoy the grace of Allah. Koran – (8:30), (10:21), (2: 225) (16 106).
Al – takiya is also used by Muslims in terrorist activities and it is practised on such a large scale that sometimes bombs have force equal to lies. For example, the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) has assured many times that it had nothing to do with the Muslim Brotherhood, that it had nothing to do with terrorism or with any form of criminal activity. However, the investigation proved that the Islamic Society of North America was founded by the Muslim Brotherhood, it helped Hamas financially, and nine of its main members were accused of terrorism. This example, although one of many, illustrates very well that the Koranic philosophy of al-takiya does not only allow but also encourages mass murders of ‘infidels’. According to the teachings of Islam, for terrorist activities Muslims ‘go to paradise’… (In this moment I would also like to remind Muslims the above verse from the Koran: 7:99).
The real master of al-takiya was a Yemeni born US passport holder called Anwar al-Awlaki. He was frequently invited to American television and in the presence of American politicians he talked many times about the peaceful nature of Islam. However, it turned out that the Muslim cleric Anwar Al-Awlaki was involved in planning terrorist attacks. To name just some of them, it was: the massacre at Fort Hood, Texas, in which 13 people were killed and 30 were wounded. The master of al-takiya Anwar Al-Awlaki also planned to blow up a passenger plane flying to Detroit. To Muslims this terrorist and many others who were trying to blow up planes, buses and shopping centres were obviously heroes, because as the Koran puts it: ‘to kill and to be killed for the cause of Allah’.
Jihad itself is also based on the philosophy of al-takiya, altough it is approaching us slowly, with small steps. It is worth mentioning that Jihad is not just about explosions and terrorist attacks, as Zionwood likes to show it to us in its films. It is also about the Muslim’s everyday interracial and intercultural relationships with non-Muslims. Their plan is to pull us away from our own culture, so through setting up families with us they could ‘fight for the cause of Allah’. This means that taking Muslims to Europe is like letting a Trojan Pig into the Western civilization.
Reliance of the traveller : “Talking is a tool for achieving the goals. If the objective is possible through both telling the truth and lying, lying is not recommended, because there is no such need. If the target (advancing Islam) can be achieved only through a lie, not telling the truth, lying is acceptable if the goal is acceptable “.
(748, 8: 2) (Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri).
Muslims lie without even thinking about it, without blinking an eye and without regret. Deception is their way of life. Lies define them as Muslims because Muslims are children of lies and all the teachings that come from them are false and based on double standards. Where there are two Muslims there are three lies, where there is Islam there are schemes leading to the destruction of all including Muslims. The Koran makes it clear that ‘there is no greater deceiver than Allah’, and it shows the prophet of Islam in the same way. Today among the most advanced liars of all Muslims are Arabs, and verses in Koran make it clear that cheating is an inseparable component of Islam. Every trick, every crime, every rape and any act of terrorism has its justification in the Koran, because every Muslim is a ‘soldier of Allah’.
The same as in the Bible, there are also stories in the Koran. The Koranic stories are about the life of Mohamed and they include philosophical messages which teach Muslims how to live. Unfortunately, some of the Koranic stories are not only based on lies, but also teach how to lie and they glorify deception.
The Hadubiya Treaty
Mohamed signed a fake, 10-year agreement with people of Mecca which guaranteed him access to the city, while at the same time he was secretly preparing his army for attack on Mecca. Two years later Mohamed launched a military offence on Mecca, he took the city, and he murdered nearly all men. He sold women as slaves, some women he raped by himself and other ones he gave to his soldiers as the ‘gifts from Allah’. That agreement which was very important in the history of shaping Islam was called the Treaty of Hadubiya, which Mohamed obviously broke, and then he murdered or expelled people of Mecca from their own city; apart from women and girls that he used as sex slaves. When Mohamed was asked why he broke the agreement and why he acted in such a cruel way, he replied that he got this right from Allah, which is a clear example of a double standard, considering the fact that apparently he was the ‘prophet of God’.
The Treaty of Hadubiya bore the names of the leaders of Mecca, and Mohamed – ‘the messenger of God’, what to people of Mecca at that time was an insult and it was simply unacceptable. The history of Islam shows very clearly that it is a militant ideology built on deceit, murder, rape and paedophilia by a criminal called Mohamed who called himself a prophet. Today Muslim theologians are trying to convince Muslims that it was the people of Mecca who broke the treaty first, but that is just another lie to keep Islam going.
And this was the way how Mecca became the capital of Islam. (Bukhari 60:10, Bukhari 50: 891)
To this day the same form of military domination of Islam has not changed at all. First there is al-takiya and then there are mass murders. The best example of this tactic is when first Arab leaders talk to Americans about peace in English, but when they go back to their countries they give venomous speeches in Arabic about destruction of America and Israel. Saddam Hussein and Yassir Arafat did that, because each one of them learned from Mohamed.
“If I take an oath to do something and later on I find a better solution that the first one, then I do what is better and I make propitiation for my oath.”
Abu Bakr As Siddiq – one of the military commanders of Muhammad (Bukhari 78: 618)
(It is also worth mentioning that before Abu Bakr converted to Islam he was a man of honour, who never broke his word, but Mohamed taught him that lying is compatible with Islam because “this is what Allah wants when it comes to strengthening Islam.”)
Usayr ibn Zarim organized an army against Muslims, because Mohamed had declared war against him first. However, ‘the prophet of Islam’ sent his emissaries to Zarim so he could meet him in a secluded place to discuss peace. Mohamed’s deception was obvious because when Zarim came to negotiate peace, him and his 30 companions were brutally murdered by the order of Mohamed. Earlier they all got the inviolability guarantees from ‘the prophet of Islam’, and came to the meeting without weapons.
Usayr ibn Zarim was a surviving leader of the Banu Nadir tribe who miraculously escaped with his life, when he was thrown away by Muslims from Medina.
And this way Medina became Muslim. (Bukhari 78: 618)
It seems that al-takiya which is a deception leading to even to mass murders in the name of Islam was used only against military enemies? But what if a defenseless poet is murdered? Ka’b bin al-Ashraf was a poet murdered by the order of Mohamed. Men who volunteered to murder Ka’b pretended that they turned against Mohamed. First by using deception Muslims led Ka’b bin al-Ashraf out of his fortress, and then they massacred him by the orders of Mohamed. (Bukhari 50: 369)
“The Prophet said: War is deceit.” (Bukhari 52: 269)
Let this article be a warning to non-Muslims that the doctrine of deceit in the Islamic world does not change, what means that a word given by a Muslim to a non-Muslim doesn’t have any meaning to him. A Muslim can even convert to Christianity, he can marry a Christian woman and live as a Catholic, but sooner or later, when Muslims become the majority in the occupied territory they will be always Muslims, and their Christian wives would be nothing more to them than just worthless prostitutes. It doesn’t matter whether it is Mohamed, Saddam Hussein, the religious leader of Iran or a kebab vendor. When it comes to Islam and the Muslim’s perverse pleasures there will be always al-takiya.
Those Muslims who are aware of the lies of Islam read the Koran to find Jesus and his messages in there. The Koran mentions Jesus, his birth by Virgin Mary, his death for the sins of all people and his crusifiction, and every Muslim also believes in Jesus. However, Muslims as those who are misguided in faith and those who are raised on the lies of Islam, simply need time to call Jesus the son of God and admit the superiority of Christianity. They need time, because ‘Muslims are the tribe of the misguided ones and deceived’. Muslims were deceived by a false prophet who told them lying visions, false prophecies, and delusions of his own heart. If a ‘prophet’ kills and rapes and calls for war, then it is not a prophet from heaven but a prophet from hell.
Islam versus education and economy
To understand better why the lie called Islam is so easily accepted and not challenged by Muslims, I have drawn my attention to the level of literacy in Islamic countries, taking into account data collected by the CIA World Factbook:
- Afghanistan 28.1%
- Pakistan 55%
- Morocco 67.1%
- Saudi Arabia 86.6%
- Egypt 73.8%
- Yemen 63.9%
- UAE 77.9%
- Oman 81.4%
Apart from that the average Muslim literacy level is always higher for men, because in many countries girls don’t have the right to education or it is made difficult for them. The only thing that in many countries tormented by Islam Muslims have the right to know is the Koran, ‘prophet’ Mohamed and his lies. However, the problem is that taking into account the above data hundreds of millions of Muslims around the world have never read the Koran and will never read it, because they are not able to. Therefore Islam is a symbol of ignorance and a regime based on mind control, possible to sustain only by lack of education, so that all Muslim nations were beings who would not be able to think for themselves.
A Muslim needs an instruction on how to live, and if he can’t read then his local imam would gladly give that Muslim his own interpretation of the Koran. For example Pakistan which is populated by 192mln people and which is a die-hard Muslim country, Koran has certainly not been read by at least 90 million people, despite the fact that 98% of the population declares themselves as Muslims. As we see by this example, the lack of education associated with Islam is being used in Pakistan and in many other Muslim countries as a way of maintaining power.
At the same time I don’t want to generalize because for example Iran (literacy level 86.8% ) has a lot of talented scientists, great doctors and well-educated women, although let’s not forget that flourishing of the Persian civilization was the greatest before the Islamic times. This means that Iran (who I respect for a number of reasons) could be a lot better and a more perfect civilization if it rejected Islam, and became interested for example in Christianity. If at least Iran ceased to be the Islamic Republic and instead became Persia of a Muslim cultural character, but nothing more than that, in my point of view it would be better for them.
I find interesting the opinion of dr. Farrukh Salem from Pakistan, who is an authority in the field of politics, economics and education. In the opinion of Dr.Salem, among the population of 1.4 billion Muslims about 800 million are illiterate. In my opinion this is not the fault of poverty in some Muslim countries but a fault of Islam, which is a medieval ideology of hatred and ignorance and which puts the native Muslim populations in a position of hostages to faith. By using lies and manipulation the elites in Muslim countries try to farm nations of lunatic donkeys, that instead of following carrots would follow the Koran.
According to a study performed by the Arab Development Report, half of all Arab women cannot read and write, only 1% of Arabs have personal computers, 1% use the Internet, and on average 1 Arab in 5 lives on $2 a day. Muslims account for about 22% of the world’s population but they produce only 5% of the global GDP, even including oil. According to the World Bank the oil-rich Saudi Arabia in 2015 reached GDP of about $649 billion, which is less than for example small Switzerland, the Netherlands and Italy, which don’t have oil.
Islam is precisely the reason that builds Muslims a wall on the path of progress and limits them in many areas of life. As it is easy to guess the majority of Muslims do not agree with Dr. Salem, and in Pakistan a lot of people do not even consider him a Muslim.
By all means I also don’t want to come out from the position of European supremacy, especially that in Europe many things deserve to be condemned too. In my opinion our European al-takiya is the cultural Marxist agenda, which takes us back in our cultural development. Therefore lies and ignorance beat people in all parts of the world.
I don’t want to be understood as someone who launches personal attack on every Muslim. On my way, usually during my travels around Muslim countries I met a lot of good, helpful and kind Muslims, but very importantly it was never about Islam nor about a white woman. My article is only about the general interpretation of Islam as an ideology based on lies, but I don’t judge every Muslim individually.
Also, I am not an enemy of Islam but a defender of Europe, defender of European culture and defender of Christianity, and it is very sad that Christians and Muslims are forced to be enemies because of directives given by the New World Order. The enemies of Islam are Jews and controlled by them Zionists leftist hypocrites, who on one hand invite Muslims to Europe, they give them rights above the native people and they give them generous benefits. On the other hand the same people invade Muslim countries and they kill Muslims in the name of ‘fighting terrorism’, which they themselves provoke .
In my opinion the Koran needs new interpretation because at the moment it is a lie, and that lie is based on the fact that a war criminal, mass murderer and a violent sex predator is considered to be the ‘prophet of God’, when in fact Mohamed was a fraud and a mentally sick heretic. I once said these words to a Muslim man, to which he replied: ‘If the prophet did that, it must have been for a good purpose.’ So I replied to him: ‘May Muslims never come to Europe with the same mission of grace as your prophet did.’
I also recommend my other article dedicated to Muslims, entitled: ‘The cultural ‘enrichment’ of Europe; part II ‘Muslims’.